SENATE_16 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  16 10235 12 NEW JER  200 WILSON  J.  -0.975 -0.221   -54.93396   61  0.406  0.393
   2  16  7953 14 PENNSYL  200 ROBERTS  J. -0.695 -0.338   -72.82387  105  0.500  0.610
   3  16  2828 54 TENNESS  200 EATON  J.H. -0.401  0.521   -68.28622  106  0.525  0.613
   4  16  5275 41 ALABAMA  200 KING  W.R.  -0.377 -0.039   -44.06306   97  0.635  0.794
   5  16  9740 44 GEORGIA  200 WALKER  F.  -0.359  0.159   -32.58454   87  0.688  0.908
   6  16  9749 41 ALABAMA  200 WALKER  J.  -0.325 -0.724   -35.13561  108  0.722  0.926
   7  16  5895 47 NORTH C  200 MACON  N.   -0.300 -0.954   -53.63532  111  0.617  0.766
   8  16  5748 51 KENTUCK  200 LOGAN  W.   -0.287  0.282   -20.34400   52  0.676  0.865
   9  16   420 40 VIRGINI  200 BARBOUR  J. -0.240 -0.251   -39.03304   93  0.657  0.828
  10  16  4988 51 KENTUCK  200 JOHNSON  R. -0.197 -0.015   -52.40564   85  0.540  0.741
  11  16 10182 46 MISSISS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.182 -0.216   -54.83750   99  0.575  0.707
  12  16  4532 46 MISSISS  200 HOLMES  D.  -0.149 -0.120   -16.68084   42  0.672  0.762
  13  16  5542 46 MISSISS  200 LEAKE  W.   -0.144  0.170   -29.12976   63  0.630  0.762
  14  16  3423 48 SOUTH C  200 GAILLARD    -0.139 -0.441   -47.08719  111  0.654  0.775
  15  16  8971 47 NORTH C  200 STOKES  M.  -0.118  0.281   -36.26965   93  0.677  0.839
  16  16  7463 52 MARYLAN  200 PINKNEY  W. -0.098  0.004   -12.41129   30  0.661  0.800
  17  16  2913 44 GEORGIA  200 ELLIOTT  J. -0.088 -0.375   -46.33808  100  0.629  0.720
  18  16  2871 21 ILLINOI  200 EDWARDS  N. -0.087  0.996   -30.97751   90  0.709  0.856
  19  16 10160 54 TENNESS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.083  0.147   -43.24673   98  0.643  0.816
  20  16  4959 45 LOUISIA  200 JOHNSON  H. -0.037  0.251   -38.38167  101  0.684  0.812
  21  16  5724 52 MARYLAN  200 LLOYD  E.   -0.018 -0.327   -34.81221   54  0.525  0.648
  22  16  9233 22 INDIANA  200 TAYLOR  W.   0.004  0.461   -57.54752   97  0.553  0.691
  23  16  1111 45 LOUISIA  200 BROWN  J.    0.045  0.104   -33.05211   63  0.592  0.730
  24  16  2561 12 NEW JER  200 DICKERSON    0.113  0.119   -70.34456  100  0.495  0.570
  25  16  8211 13 NEW YOR  200 SANFORD  N.  0.127  0.179   -76.41997  108  0.493  0.583
  26  16  9159 51 KENTUCK  200 TALBOT  I.   0.157  0.717   -22.45488   45  0.607  0.711
  27  16  8694 48 SOUTH C  200 SMITH  W.    0.169 -0.986   -73.36734  108  0.507  0.620
  28  16  1635  2 MAINE    200 CHANDLER     0.180 -0.130   -32.17498   46  0.497  0.587
  29  16  7216  4 NEW HAM  200 PARROTT  J.  0.222  0.031   -45.30210  104  0.647  0.779
  30  16  9297 21 ILLINOI  200 THOMAS  J.   0.250  0.732   -38.04432  100  0.684  0.840
  31  16  6941 22 INDIANA  200 NOBLE  J.    0.286  0.958   -48.78138   82  0.552  0.610
  32  16  6693  4 NEW HAM  200 MORRIL  D.   0.324 -0.946   -48.49161   91  0.587  0.692
  33  16  9613 11 DELAWAR    1 VANDYKE  N.  0.419 -0.232   -38.49805   87  0.642  0.793
  34  16  9378  6 VERMONT    1 TICHENOR     0.420 -0.646   -31.60365   87  0.695  0.897
  35  16  8107 24 OHIO     200 RUGGLES  B.  0.435  0.900   -68.21612   99  0.502  0.596
  36  16  4762  5 RHODE I    1 HUNTER  W.   0.489 -0.123   -38.61875   96  0.669  0.802
  37  16  5339  5 RHODE I  200 KNIGHT  N.   0.496  0.327   -13.24890   32  0.661  0.750
  38  16  4586 11 DELAWAR    1 HORSEY  O.   0.528 -0.033   -36.65480   75  0.613  0.773
  39  16  7182  6 VERMONT  200 PALMER  W.   0.534  0.365   -45.68975   87  0.591  0.690
  40  16  9477 24 OHIO     200 TRIMBLE  W.  0.568  0.823   -58.68059  111  0.589  0.721
  41  16  5270 13 NEW YOR    1 KING  R.     0.591 -0.331   -44.68007  104  0.651  0.760
  42  16  5817 14 PENNSYL  200 LOWRIE  W.   0.627  0.545   -57.25213  111  0.597  0.685
  43  16  8752 12 NEW JER  200 SOUTHARD     0.633  0.586   -13.20489   25  0.590  0.720
  44  16  6528  3 MASSACH    1 MILLS  E.H.  0.657 -0.245   -18.81160   46  0.664  0.804
  45  16  7108  3 MASSACH    1 OTIS  H.G.   0.668 -0.079   -39.37751   96  0.664  0.813
  46  16  5465  1 CONNECT  200 LANMAN  J.   0.726  0.535   -45.62101  107  0.653  0.813
  47  16  6410  3 MASSACH    1 MELLEN  P.   0.728 -0.488   -14.48568   55  0.768  0.945
  48  16  1305  5 RHODE I    1 BURRILL  J.  0.729 -0.296   -17.25949   67  0.773  0.910
  49  16  2316  1 CONNECT    1 DANA  S.W.   0.791 -0.168   -39.06382  100  0.677  0.830


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2013
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links