SENATE_36 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  36  3192 41 ALABAMA  100 FITZPATRICK -0.734  0.679   -87.47739  351  0.779  0.877
   2  36 10093 49 TEXAS    100 WIGFALL  L. -0.663 -0.513  -123.61050  385  0.725  0.849
   3  36  1808 41 ALABAMA  100 CLAY  C. C. -0.651  0.759   -40.62304  181  0.799  0.928
   4  36  4833 44 GEORGIA  100 IVERSON  A. -0.644 -0.066  -138.42574  342  0.667  0.822
   5  36  5444 72 OREGON   100 LANE  J.    -0.633 -0.599  -137.35655  523  0.769  0.891
   6  36  2393 46 MISSISS  100 DAVIS  J.   -0.631  0.486   -98.95695  318  0.733  0.858
   7  36 10462 43 FLORIDA  100 YULEE  D. L -0.592  0.490   -60.51735  201  0.740  0.851
   8  36  4759 40 VIRGINI  100 HUNTER  R.  -0.590  0.804  -106.31978  463  0.795  0.905
   9  36  6053 40 VIRGINI  100 MASON  J. M -0.573  0.693  -110.51532  447  0.781  0.888
  10  36  3780 34 MISSOUR  100 GREEN  J. S -0.569 -0.252  -158.86267  448  0.701  0.842
  11  36  7509 34 MISSOUR  100 POLK  T.    -0.559 -0.417  -156.97766  451  0.706  0.827
  12  36  7572 51 KENTUCK  100 POWELL  L.  -0.532  0.311  -129.82076  534  0.784  0.897
  13  36  8223 11 DELAWAR  100 SAULSBURY   -0.527  0.310  -100.25733  290  0.708  0.838
  14  36  4296 49 TEXAS    100 HEMPHILL  J -0.515 -0.533  -167.92085  496  0.713  0.849
  15  36  4007 48 SOUTH C  100 HAMMOND  J. -0.503  0.817   -68.12362  215  0.728  0.828
  16  36  1686 48 SOUTH C  100 CHESNUT  J. -0.503  0.216   -70.99371  264  0.764  0.879
  17  36  8575 45 LOUISIA  100 SLIDELL  J. -0.497  0.177   -64.74438  258  0.778  0.895
  18  36  5942 43 FLORIDA  100 MALLORY  S. -0.483  0.102   -76.63873  224  0.710  0.848
  19  36  4198 71 CALIFOR  100 HAUN  H. P. -0.470 -0.735   -11.90549   42  0.753  0.833
  20  36  7854 33 MINNESO  100 RICE  H. M. -0.460 -0.776  -192.87480  486  0.672  0.802
  21  36  1038 22 INDIANA  100 BRIGHT  J.  -0.450 -0.591  -124.37997  400  0.733  0.865
  22  36   968 47 NORTH C  100 BRAGG  T.   -0.445  0.483  -156.57127  553  0.753  0.868
  23  36  6921 54 TENNESS  100 NICHOLSON   -0.432 -0.181  -160.81577  502  0.726  0.851
  24  36  1095 46 MISSISS  100 BROWN  A. G -0.425  0.155  -170.60600  305  0.572  0.689
  25  36  7643 24 OHIO     100 PUGH  G. E. -0.425 -0.831  -145.31175  286  0.602  0.727
  26  36  8339 42 ARKANSA  100 SEBASTIAN   -0.424 -0.019  -114.05881  431  0.767  0.886
  27  36  4990 42 ARKANSA  100 JOHNSON  R. -0.423  0.252  -107.43503  376  0.751  0.870
  28  36  3887 71 CALIFOR  100 GWIN  W. M. -0.382 -0.358  -135.42137  417  0.723  0.854
  29  36   525 11 DELAWAR  100 BAYARD  J.  -0.365  0.587   -69.30919  282  0.782  0.876
  30  36  4940 54 TENNESS  100 JOHNSON  A. -0.359 -0.088  -252.73318  499  0.603  0.752
  31  36  3177 22 INDIANA  100 FITCH  G. N -0.354 -0.226  -168.79341  437  0.680  0.815
  32  36   709 14 PENNSYL  100 BIGLER  W.  -0.353 -0.368  -175.59177  484  0.696  0.855
  33  36  9423 44 GEORGIA  100 TOOMBS  R.  -0.340  0.940   -93.87435  259  0.696  0.826
  34  36  9352 12 NEW JER  100 THOMSON  J. -0.270  0.073  -100.78851  248  0.666  0.806
  35  36  2692 21 ILLINOI  100 DOUGLAS  S. -0.265 -0.558  -115.14905  269  0.652  0.818
  36  36  5177 52 MARYLAN  310 KENNEDY  A. -0.262  0.163  -123.46810  392  0.730  0.852
  37  36   627 45 LOUISIA  100 BENJAMIN  J -0.252  0.380   -57.03426  232  0.782  0.914
  38  36  1846 47 NORTH C  100 CLINGMAN  T -0.231  0.546  -143.16466  443  0.724  0.831
  39  36  5490 71 CALIFOR  100 LATHAM  M.  -0.200  0.140  -212.05508  444  0.620  0.741
  40  36  7282 52 MARYLAN  100 PEARCE  J.  -0.070  0.869  -145.85011  388  0.687  0.817
  41  36  2668 25 WISCONS  200 DOOLITTLE    0.006 -0.627  -158.35216  525  0.740  0.827
  42  36  2181 51 KENTUCK  310 CRITTENDEN   0.029  0.676  -157.59526  383  0.663  0.809
  43  36  5269 13 NEW YOR  200 KING  P.     0.047 -0.999  -178.59187  479  0.689  0.795
  44  36   718 23 MICHIGA  200 BINGHAM  K.  0.060 -0.998  -173.19920  489  0.702  0.796
  45  36  9255 12 NEW JER  200 TEN EYCK  J  0.093 -0.738  -110.30994  477  0.794  0.887
  46  36   361 72 OREGON   200 BAKER  E. D  0.107  0.074   -65.31078  160  0.665  0.800
  47  36  2617  1 CONNECT  200 DIXON  J.    0.111 -0.233  -123.80457  443  0.756  0.847
  48  36  3922  4 NEW HAM  200 HALE  J. P.  0.131 -0.965  -158.54779  471  0.714  0.811
  49  36  9492 21 ILLINOI  200 TRUMBULL  L  0.137 -0.078  -174.14391  521  0.716  0.839
  50  36  3310  1 CONNECT  200 FOSTER  L.   0.160 -0.840  -132.83887  517  0.773  0.863
  51  36  3834 31 IOWA     200 GRIMES  J.   0.175  0.028  -173.58890  497  0.705  0.845
  52  36  1940  6 VERMONT  200 COLLAMER  J  0.206 -0.177   -91.95869  403  0.796  0.906
  53  36  4001  2 MAINE    200 HAMLIN  H.   0.212 -0.977   -66.24291  244  0.762  0.877
  54  36  3127  2 MAINE    200 FESSENDEN    0.259 -0.482  -127.93613  508  0.777  0.878
  55  36  2793 25 WISCONS  200 DURKEE  C.   0.281 -0.958   -88.56456  439  0.817  0.904
  56  36  3256  6 VERMONT  200 FOOT  S.     0.282 -0.059  -129.90501  509  0.775  0.896
  57  36  1437 14 PENNSYL  200 CAMERON  S.  0.284 -0.139  -108.48611  309  0.704  0.835
  58  36  1759  4 NEW HAM  200 CLARK  D.    0.288 -0.824  -109.38098  491  0.800  0.900
  59  36   212  5 RHODE I  200 ANTHONY  H.  0.297 -0.694  -134.15097  496  0.763  0.871
  60  36  8378 13 NEW YOR  200 SEWARD  W.   0.297 -0.310   -99.16188  329  0.740  0.851
  61  36  1057 71 CALIFOR  100 BRODERICK    0.315  0.906    -8.73791   31  0.754  0.935
  62  36  6697  2 MAINE    200 MORRILL  L.  0.318 -0.570   -25.69423  163  0.854  0.933
  63  36  8516  5 RHODE I  200 SIMMONS  J.  0.324 -0.240  -104.85288  497  0.810  0.891
  64  36 10225  3 MASSACH  200 WILSON  H.   0.344 -0.212  -159.11436  552  0.750  0.862
  65  36  4077 31 IOWA     200 HARLAN  J.   0.346  0.222  -134.42622  528  0.775  0.877
  66  36  9083  3 MASSACH  200 SUMNER  C.   0.351 -0.242  -105.95783  484  0.803  0.903
  67  36 10121 33 MINNESO  200 WILKINSON    0.422  0.562  -128.01138  422  0.738  0.860
  68  36  9698 24 OHIO     200 WADE  B. F.  0.587  0.130  -111.37572  536  0.812  0.903
  69  36  1642 23 MICHIGA  200 CHANDLER  Z  0.624  0.139  -103.68009  527  0.821  0.928


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links