SENATE_SORT36 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  36  3192 41 ALABAMA  100 FITZPATRICK -0.743  0.670   -87.49891  351  0.779  0.883
   2  36 10093 49 TEXAS    100 WIGFALL  L. -0.663 -0.512  -123.13620  385  0.726  0.847
   3  36  4833 44 GEORGIA  100 IVERSON  A. -0.650 -0.084  -138.67825  342  0.667  0.810
   4  36  1808 41 ALABAMA  100 CLAY  C. C. -0.647  0.762   -39.73862  181  0.803  0.928
   5  36  5444 72 OREGON   100 LANE  J.    -0.633 -0.599  -138.70326  523  0.767  0.891
   6  36  2393 46 MISSISS  100 DAVIS  J.   -0.631  0.486   -98.32220  318  0.734  0.855
   7  36 10462 43 FLORIDA  100 YULEE  D. L -0.602  0.487   -60.60928  201  0.740  0.851
   8  36  4759 40 VIRGINI  100 HUNTER  R.  -0.599  0.801  -107.15237  463  0.793  0.898
   9  36  3780 34 MISSOUR  100 GREEN  J. S -0.579 -0.252  -159.04044  448  0.701  0.842
  10  36  6053 40 VIRGINI  100 MASON  J. M -0.573  0.693  -110.92339  447  0.780  0.884
  11  36  7509 34 MISSOUR  100 POLK  T.    -0.559 -0.417  -158.40625  451  0.704  0.823
  12  36  7572 51 KENTUCK  100 POWELL  L.  -0.542  0.311  -130.27681  534  0.784  0.895
  13  36  8223 11 DELAWAR  100 SAULSBURY   -0.527  0.310  -100.97079  290  0.706  0.841
  14  36  4296 49 TEXAS    100 HEMPHILL  J -0.521 -0.541  -164.94606  496  0.717  0.843
  15  36  4007 48 SOUTH C  100 HAMMOND  J. -0.513  0.816   -68.38967  215  0.728  0.833
  16  36  1686 48 SOUTH C  100 CHESNUT  J. -0.507  0.204   -71.33212  264  0.763  0.883
  17  36  8575 45 LOUISIA  100 SLIDELL  J. -0.497  0.177   -65.00141  258  0.777  0.888
  18  36  5942 43 FLORIDA  100 MALLORY  S. -0.493  0.101   -76.67741  224  0.710  0.862
  19  36  4198 71 CALIFOR  100 HAUN  H. P. -0.470 -0.737   -11.60620   42  0.759  0.833
  20  36  7854 33 MINNESO  100 RICE  H. M. -0.460 -0.776  -192.43513  486  0.673  0.805
  21  36   968 47 NORTH C  100 BRAGG  T.   -0.455  0.484  -157.27776  553  0.752  0.866
  22  36  1038 22 INDIANA  100 BRIGHT  J.  -0.453 -0.590  -124.33740  400  0.733  0.865
  23  36  6921 54 TENNESS  100 NICHOLSON   -0.432 -0.181  -160.29689  502  0.727  0.857
  24  36  1095 46 MISSISS  100 BROWN  A. G -0.425  0.155  -171.23372  305  0.570  0.689
  25  36  8339 42 ARKANSA  100 SEBASTIAN   -0.424 -0.019  -114.41232  431  0.767  0.884
  26  36  4990 42 ARKANSA  100 JOHNSON  R. -0.423  0.252  -106.41227  376  0.754  0.870
  27  36  7643 24 OHIO     100 PUGH  G. E. -0.415 -0.832  -148.75256  286  0.594  0.724
  28  36  3887 71 CALIFOR  100 GWIN  W. M. -0.392 -0.359  -135.56856  417  0.722  0.851
  29  36   525 11 DELAWAR  100 BAYARD  J.  -0.365  0.587   -69.40857  282  0.782  0.879
  30  36  4940 54 TENNESS  100 JOHNSON  A. -0.359 -0.088  -250.00185  499  0.606  0.747
  31  36  3177 22 INDIANA  100 FITCH  G. N -0.354 -0.226  -170.88409  437  0.676  0.815
  32  36   709 14 PENNSYL  100 BIGLER  W.  -0.350 -0.378  -173.59113  484  0.699  0.862
  33  36  9423 44 GEORGIA  100 TOOMBS  R.  -0.345  0.939   -96.88812  259  0.688  0.822
  34  36  9352 12 NEW JER  100 THOMSON  J. -0.280  0.072  -102.35567  248  0.662  0.815
  35  36  2692 21 ILLINOI  100 DOUGLAS  S. -0.265 -0.558  -115.33433  269  0.651  0.822
  36  36  5177 52 MARYLAN  310 KENNEDY  A. -0.262  0.163  -123.79317  392  0.729  0.849
  37  36   627 45 LOUISIA  100 BENJAMIN  J -0.262  0.380   -55.86536  232  0.786  0.918
  38  36  1846 47 NORTH C  100 CLINGMAN  T -0.231  0.546  -147.96808  443  0.716  0.840
  39  36  5490 71 CALIFOR  100 LATHAM  M.  -0.210  0.140  -216.40874  444  0.614  0.734
  40  36  7282 52 MARYLAN  100 PEARCE  J.  -0.070  0.869  -148.20749  388  0.683  0.809
  41  36  2668 25 WISCONS  200 DOOLITTLE   -0.007 -0.615  -163.49582  525  0.732  0.830
  42  36  2181 51 KENTUCK  310 CRITTENDEN   0.027  0.686  -160.45891  383  0.658  0.804
  43  36  5269 13 NEW YOR  200 KING  P.     0.044 -0.999  -180.88129  479  0.685  0.791
  44  36   718 23 MICHIGA  200 BINGHAM  K.  0.058 -0.998  -176.55626  489  0.697  0.789
  45  36  9255 12 NEW JER  200 TEN EYCK  J  0.091 -0.718  -112.66576  477  0.790  0.885
  46  36   361 72 OREGON   200 BAKER  E. D  0.107  0.074   -67.63470  160  0.655  0.806
  47  36  2617  1 CONNECT  200 DIXON  J.    0.112 -0.223  -124.24627  443  0.755  0.856
  48  36  3922  4 NEW HAM  200 HALE  J. P.  0.131 -0.965  -163.01317  471  0.707  0.809
  49  36  9492 21 ILLINOI  200 TRUMBULL  L  0.132 -0.066  -174.96487  521  0.715  0.829
  50  36  3310  1 CONNECT  200 FOSTER  L.   0.152 -0.819  -131.94281  517  0.775  0.872
  51  36  3834 31 IOWA     200 GRIMES  J.   0.172  0.058  -172.84285  497  0.706  0.839
  52  36  1940  6 VERMONT  200 COLLAMER  J  0.196 -0.172   -91.43710  403  0.797  0.911
  53  36  4001  2 MAINE    200 HAMLIN  H.   0.203 -0.979   -66.04858  244  0.763  0.877
  54  36  3127  2 MAINE    200 FESSENDEN    0.259 -0.462  -127.40599  508  0.778  0.882
  55  36  1759  4 NEW HAM  200 CLARK  D.    0.278 -0.817  -110.81785  491  0.798  0.898
  56  36  3256  6 VERMONT  200 FOOT  S.     0.279 -0.050  -129.93588  509  0.775  0.888
  57  36  2793 25 WISCONS  200 DURKEE  C.   0.280 -0.953   -90.83312  439  0.813  0.904
  58  36  1437 14 PENNSYL  200 CAMERON  S.  0.284 -0.139  -109.04881  309  0.703  0.832
  59  36   212  5 RHODE I  200 ANTHONY  H.  0.287 -0.694  -132.49168  496  0.766  0.873
  60  36  8378 13 NEW YOR  200 SEWARD  W.   0.297 -0.310  -100.51003  329  0.737  0.848
  61  36  1057 71 CALIFOR  100 BRODERICK    0.306  0.910   -10.49829   31  0.713  0.903
  62  36  6697  2 MAINE    200 MORRILL  L.  0.308 -0.570   -26.57897  163  0.850  0.933
  63  36  8516  5 RHODE I  200 SIMMONS  J.  0.318 -0.222  -105.63048  497  0.809  0.891
  64  36 10225  3 MASSACH  200 WILSON  H.   0.344 -0.212  -159.94583  552  0.748  0.862
  65  36  4077 31 IOWA     200 HARLAN  J.   0.347  0.232  -136.55571  528  0.772  0.871
  66  36  9083  3 MASSACH  200 SUMNER  C.   0.351 -0.242  -106.52676  484  0.802  0.907
  67  36 10121 33 MINNESO  200 WILKINSON    0.413  0.566  -127.90388  422  0.739  0.855
  68  36  9698 24 OHIO     200 WADE  B. F.  0.587  0.129  -108.77845  536  0.816  0.910
  69  36  1642 23 MICHIGA  200 CHANDLER  Z  0.619  0.148  -104.56269  527  0.820  0.924


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links