101st Congress > House > Vote 712

Date: September 24, 1990

Result: 410-4 (Passed)

Clerk session vote number: 362

Vote Subject Matter: Government Management / Government Organization

Sponsor: CONYERS, John, Jr. (D-MI)

Bill number: HR4279

Question: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass

Description: CASH MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1990

Bill summary: Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 - Amends Federal law to require each head of an executive agency (other than the Tennessee Valley Authority) to provide for the timely disbursement of Federal funds through cash, checks, electronic funds transfer, or any other means identified by the Secretary of the Treasury. Authorizes the Secretary to collect a charge from any agency which does not comply with such requirement. Requires the Secretary to prescribe implementing regulations. Revises provisions regarding intergovernmental transfers of funds and provides for the payment of interest on such funds until the time that they are disbursed. Directs the Secretary to issue implementing regulations. Directs the Secretary to make all reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with each State relating to procedures and requirements for transfers of funds between executive agencies and States, by not later than two years after the date of enactment of this Act. Requires, four years after the date of enactment, the Comptroller General to report to the Congress on an audit of the implementation of cash management procedures set up by the Federal/State agreements.

Bill titles: To amend title 31, United States Code, to improve cash management of funds transferred between the Federal Government and the States, and for other purposes.

Original source documents: Digest of the Congressional Record vol. 136, p. 7972;

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map Help: click states or districts to filter members.

Vote Ideological Breakdown Help: click and drag on the plot to focus on selected members.

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes Download as XLS Help: click bars to focus the vote list.

Votes
(Sort by , , , , )
Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within .