101st Congress > House > Vote 731

Date: September 25, 1990

Result: 342-53 (Passed)

Clerk session vote number: 382

Vote Subject Matter: Government Management / Budget Special Interest

Sponsor: LAGOMARSINO, Robert John (R-CA)

Bill number: HR4019

Question: ON ORDERING A SECOND

Description: TO ORDER A SECOND ON THE VENTO (D, MN) MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS HR 4019, MICHIGAN SCENIC RIVERS ACT OF 1990, TO DESIGNATE CERTAIN RIVERS IN MICHIGAN AS COMPONENTS OF THE NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM.

Bill summary: Michigan Scenic Rivers Act of 1990 - Amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain rivers in Michigan as components of or potential additions to the national wild and scenic rivers system. Authorizes the Secretary to acquire fee title to lands which, as of August 1, 1990, were owned by Upper Peninsula Energy Corporation without regard to any acreage limitation set forth in this Act. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to study certain rivers for possible designations as wild and scenic rivers and to establish for each such river a River Study Committee to advise him in the preparation of a study report to the Congress. Terminates each such Committee after submission of its report. Permits the installation and operation of facilities or other activities within or outside the boundaries of such designated river segments for the control of the lamprey eel, subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Secretary may prescribe for the protection of water quality and other values (including wild and scenic characteristics) of the river. Authorizes appropriations.

Bill titles: To designate certain rivers in the State of Michigan as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

Original source documents: Digest of the Congressional Record vol. 136, p. 8034;

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map Help: click states or districts to filter members.

Vote Ideological Breakdown Help: click and drag on the plot to focus on selected members.

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes Download as XLS Help: click bars to focus the vote list.

Votes
(Sort by , , , , )
Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within .