101st Congress > House > Vote 743

Date: 1990-10-01

Result: 397-11 (Passed)

Clerk session vote number: 395

Vote Subject Matter: Foreign and Defense Policy / Foreign Policy Resolutions

Sponsor: YATRON, Gus (D-PA)

Bill number: HJRES418

Question: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass

Description: PROTECTING ANTARCTICA AS A GLOBAL ECOLOGICAL COMMONS

Bill summary: Declares that: (1) Antarctica is a global ecological commons and should be subjected to a new agreement or protocol which supplements the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, which should be subject to periodic review, and which should establish Antarctica as a region closed for an indefinite period to commercial minerals development and related activities; (2) under such agreement, information about minerals or other resources in Antarctica should be obtained under strictly controlled arrangements and (...show more) should be openly shared within the international scientific community; (3) the Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities is not adequate to protect the environment of Antarctica and could stimulate commercial exploitation; (4) pending the negotiation and entry into force of a new agreement, the Convention should not be presented to the Senate for advice and consent to ratification and the United States should support the interim measures in force among the Consultative Parties to the Antarctic Treaty; and (5) the negotiation of such a new agreement should be a major item on the agenda of the November 1990 meeting of the Antarctica Treaty Convention Parties in Santiago, Chile.

Click to hide full description.

Bill titles: Calling for the United States to encourage immediate negotiations toward a new agreement among Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties, for the full protection of Antarctica as a global ecological commons.

Original source documents: Digest of the Congressional Record vol. 136, p. 8550;

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map

Vote Ideological Breakdown

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes

Votes
Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within . Remove Filter