UCLA Presents voteview.com beta 3

Welcome! We have just updated Voteview's aging codebase. In the process, we have fixed some nagging issues, added a few new features, and improved performance. If you notice anything that used to work that no longer does, please let us know.

106th Congress > House > Vote 104

Date: May 04, 1999

Result: 413-2 (Passed)

Clerk session vote number: 105

Vote Subject Matter: Social Welfare / Domestic Social Policy

Sponsor: GOODLING, William Franklin (R-PA)

Bill number: HCONRES84

Question: On Motion to Suspend Rules and Agree, as Amended

Description: Urging the Congress and the President to Fully Fund the Federal Government’s Obligation Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Bill summary: Urges the Congress and the President, working within the constraints of the balanced budget agreement, to give programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) the highest priority among Federal elementary and secondary education programs by meeting the commitment to fund the maximum State grant allocation for educating children with disabilities under such Act, prior to authorizing or appropriating funds for any new education initiative, while retaining the commitment to fund existing Federal education programs that increase student achievement. Declares that any local educational agency choosing to use specified authority to treat certain IDEA funds as local funds should use those local funds to provide additional funding for any Federal, State, or local education program.

Bill titles: Urging the Congress and the President to fully fund the Federal Government's obligation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map

Note: This map combines minor parties to increase visual clarity. Click here to view all parties separately.

Vote Ideological Breakdown

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes

(Sort by , , , , )

Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within .