103rd Congress > Senate > Vote 17

Date: February 24, 1993

Result: 30-68 (Amendment Rejected)

Clerk session vote number: 17

Vote Subject Matter: Government Management / Internal Organization

Sponsor: FORD, Wendell Hampton (D-KY)

Bill number: SRES71

Question: On the Amendment

Description: To eliminate funding for the Special Committee on Aging and to abolish the committee.

Bill summary: Omnibus Committee Funding Resolution for 1993 and 1994 - Authorizes expenditures by the Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress and the following Senate committees from March 1, 1993, through September 30, 1994, and for the period March 1, 1994, through February 28, 1995: (1) Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; (2) Appropriations; (3) Armed Services; (4) Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; (5) Budget; (6) Commerce, Science, and Transportation; (7) Energy and Natural Resources; (8) Environment and Public Works; (9) Finance; (10) Foreign Relations; (11) Governmental Affairs; (12) Judiciary; (13) Labor and Human Resources; (14) Rules and Administration; (15) Small Business; (16) Veterans' Affairs; (17) Aging; (18) Intelligence; and (19) Indian Affairs. Authorizes the transfer of any unexpended balance of any committee for the period ending February 28, 1993, to a special reserve for such committee. Earmarks a specified amount to be available for each Committee. Expresses the sense of the Senate that the salary of Senators should be frozen for one year. Redesignates the Select Committee on Indian Affairs as the Committee on Indian Affairs. Prohibits a Senate committee from carrying over an unexpended balance beyond March 1, 1995.

Bill titles: An original resolution authorizing biennial expenditures by the committees of the Senate.

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map Help: click states or districts to filter members.

Vote Ideological Breakdown Help: click and drag on the plot to focus on selected members.

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes Download as XLS Help: click bars to focus the vote list.

Votes
(Sort by , , , , )
Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within .