UCLA Presents voteview.com beta 3

Welcome! We have just updated Voteview's aging codebase. In the process, we have fixed some nagging issues, added a few new features, and improved performance. If you notice anything that used to work that no longer does, please let us know.

107th Congress > House > Vote 919

Date: September 25, 2002

Result: 217-200 (Passed)

Clerk session vote number: 413

Vote Subject Matter: Government Management / Budget Special Interest

Sponsor: SESSIONS, Pete (R-TX)

Bill number: HRES547

Question: On Ordering the Previous Question

Description: Providing for consideration of H.Res 540 regarding completion of Congressional action on H.R. 3762, Pension Security; H. Res. 544, regarding permanency of pension reform provisions; and H.Res. 543, regarding completion of Congressionalaction on H.R. 4019, making marriage tax relief permanent.

Bill summary: Sets forth the rule (closed) for the consideration of the following resolutions that express the sense of the House of Representatives: (1) H.Res. 540 that Congress should complete action on H.R. 3762 (pension security); (2) H.Res. 544 on permanency of pension reform law; and (3) H.Res. 543 that Congress should complete action on H.R. 4019 (permanent marriage tax relief).

Bill titles: Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 540) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should complete action on H.R. 3762, the Pension Security Act of 2002; for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 544) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on permanency of pension reform provisions; and for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 543) expressing the sense of the House that Congress should complete action on H.R. 4019, making marriage tax relief permanent.

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map

Note: This map combines minor parties to increase visual clarity. Click here to view all parties separately.

Vote Ideological Breakdown

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes

(Sort by , , , , )

Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within .