UCLA Presents voteview.com beta 3

Welcome! We have just updated Voteview's aging codebase. In the process, we have fixed some nagging issues, added a few new features, and improved performance. If you notice anything that used to work that no longer does, please let us know.

102nd Congress > Senate > Vote 228

Date: October 24, 1991

Result: 86-12 (Resolution Agreed to)

Clerk session vote number: 228

Vote Subject Matter: Government Management / Government Organization

Sponsor: MITCHELL, George John (D-ME)

Bill number: SRES202

Question: On the Resolution

Description: A resolution to appoint a special independent counsel to investigate, utilizing the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the General Accounting Office, and any other Government department or agency as may be appropriate, recent unauthorized disclosures of nonpublic confidential information.

Bill summary: Establishes an Office of Temporary Special Independent Counsel, to be directed by a special independent counsel, to investigate, utilizing the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the General Accounting Office, and any other Government department or agency as may be appropriate, unauthorized disclosures of nonpublic confidential information during the Clarence Thomas Supreme Court confirmation hearings and the Charles Keating investigation. Directs the counsel to report investigation findings to the Majority and Minority Leaders for appropriate action.

Bill titles: A resolution to appoint a special independent counsel to investigate, utilizing the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the General Accounting Office, and any other Government department or agency as may be appropriate, recent unauthorized disclosures of nonpublic confidential information.

Links for more info on the vote: congress.gov

Loading graphics...

Error!

Member Vote Map

Note: This map combines minor parties to increase visual clarity. Click here to view all parties separately.

Vote Ideological Breakdown

This chart describes how members voted on the rollcall. Members are placed according to their NOMINATE ideological scores. A cutting line divides the vote into those expected to vote "Yea" and those expected to vote "Nay". The shaded heatmap reflects the expected probability of voting "Yea". You can select points or regions to subset the members listed above and below.

Votes

(Sort by , , , , )

Selected: of from including with NOMINATE scores within .